Discussion about this post

User's avatar
man of aran's avatar

Very informative and interesting! I wonder, though, if you are not missing what for many artists has replaced the traditional patron, one that is all but invisible, or taken for granted, and that is the state, through endowments and arts grants, for groups and individuals. Here in Canada, at least, almost all 'fine art' painters and literary writers (poets etc) depend on government grants or are able to apply for them. It may be that we think it 'odd' to tell an artist what to paint, but it's not really the case that state 'patronage' is unconditional. An artist accepting funding from the government is is some fashion limited by what the government bodies tasked with doling our grants will accept. It's a largely unquestioned norm today to believe that governments should be in the business of supporting the 'arts', but I think a case can be made against it. Not making that case here myself, just offering a perspective that might be helpful.

Expand full comment
George Bothamley's avatar

I really enjoyed this, Nicole. It's fascinating to think of how art has changed over the years from patronage being pretty much the standard model for artists, to nowadays where personal creative freedom is much more prized. (And even the likes of Picasso or Degas generally refused to work to commissions!)

I guess in many ways, I guess it's a good thing that art is now seen as a much more individual/personal expression rather than something produced to specific requirements. But still, I definitely think the patron model had a lot of benefits too, as we can see beyond doubt by looking at the masterpieces that came out of the renaissance. So I do wish there would be more of a return to that in our modern world again.

Great work as ever!

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts